By CBDINSTOCK MEDIA TEAM
Michigan’s Cannabis Regulatory Agency announced on September 16 that it had revoked Michigan Investment 10 LLC’s medical processor license and imposed a $2 million fine attached to that license. A separate order records the company’s adult-use processor license as closed. Both orders take effect September 24.
MJBizDaily has described Michigan Investment 10 as a producer of Muha Meds vaporizer products. The CRA release and the orders reviewed for this article name the licensed company and its two Michigan licenses; they do not address other operations using the Muha Meds name.
For a brand that relies on contract processing, the difference is practical. The familiar name on the package may not be the company that holds the license and controls the production records for a particular run.
What Michigan ordered
Medical order ENF 23-00785 covers processor license PR-000165. It revokes the license and assesses Michigan Investment 10 a $2 million fine, payable within 30 days of the order’s effective date. Adult-use order ENF 23-00784 covers license AU-P-000171 and states that the license closed on September 8.
Both orders were signed September 14 and become effective ten days later. The CRA’s announcement gives the effective date as September 24.
According to the CRA release and final orders, the matter began with a summary suspension on November 15, 2023. That suspension was later dissolved, and a contested hearing followed. An administrative law judge issued a proposal for decision on June 18, 2026. The CRA then accepted the judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The agency’s release calls the violations egregious. It singles out an extraction-room camera that was pointed at a wall rather than the activity it was meant to record. MJBizDaily, citing CRA investigators and an agency order, also reported that the company could not locate packages containing 105.7 pounds of marijuana product and that investigators found distillate packages without Metrc tags.
The sanctions in the two orders are different. The $2 million fine appears in the medical order. The adult-use order records that license as already closed and says the violations may be considered if the company or its supplemental applicants seek another license or renewal.
The documents reviewed here do not say what will happen to products previously made under those licenses. They do not identify a replacement processor or describe the status of operations in other jurisdictions.
Who holds the license
Hardware specifications, packaging artwork and an oil certificate of analysis rarely identify every legal entity responsible for a regulated production run.
Before releasing materials or a purchase order, the brand’s file can name the company receiving the cannabis, the production facility and the license number covering the work. A dated check against an official state record is more useful than a trading name or sales contact.
The commercial question is how quickly a brand will learn of a status change. The agreement can identify who gives notice and which work pauses if the processor’s license is suspended, restricted or closed.
Tying the run to its records
The missing packages and untagged distillate described in MJBizDaily’s report show why the responsible license and production records belong in the same review.
For a vape run, a brand can request the package identifiers for the input material, the transfer manifest and the finished-package record. It can also record the test status used for release. This is a narrower exercise than a regulator’s audit: the brand is connecting its own order with the facility and records that covered the work.
If a processor operates through related entities or more than one location, the responsible license should be settled before the order is placed.
Decide what happens if production stops
A license problem can leave filled devices at the processor while printed packaging sits elsewhere. When the service agreement is silent, ownership and custody may be difficult to reconstruct.
The parties can decide in advance who has access to batch records and how work in progress will be handled during a regulatory hold. Any transfer or disposition still depends on what the regulator permits. A change of processor also needs a named approver and a record of the checks repeated before work resumes.
Hardware approval has a different scope. Incoming inspection checks dimensions, resistance and leakage against the approved specification. Oil compatibility is established earlier through qualification and pilot fills. Neither activity establishes that the processor’s license is active or that the filled batch moved through the required state records.
What to watch after September 24
The next records to watch are any CRA update, court filing or inventory notice.
Editorial note: This News Analysis is based on public regulatory records and attributed trade reporting. It is not legal advice. CBDINSTOCK supplies vape hardware and was not involved in the cited proceeding.
